What is remarkable in this entry is that the LA Times completely ignores Anonymous. It mentions that:
The Church quickly went on a campaign to eradicate the videos from YouTube, but succeeded only in outraging many online denizens.but does not mention Anonymous in name nor does it mention the movement at all. Since I can find no other entries mentioning Scientology for this year in review, I conclude that Anonymous is completely ... anonymous. The whole advent seems to be completely ignored.
1 comment:
That's rather specious logic, isn't it? "They wrote a single paragraph on the subject and they didn't mention Anonymous in that paragraph, therefore Anonymous is of no importance"? Not very convincing.
Post a Comment