Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Magoo Admits to Censorship

From Magoo's channel:
"I delete, because you don't care about me, you're here to spread what you THINK is "Black PR", and it's a distraction off of any message."
Check my previous post for example of what she deletes.

"I delete, because you don't care about me.

Magoo claims that legitimate discussion about the inconsistencies between what she says to the press and her affidavit is a sign that the poster don't "care about her". And this is why she deletes, of course, no because it contains uncomfortable truth...

you're here to spread what you THINK is "Black PR".

Magoo calls legitimate discussion about the inconsistencies between what she says to the press and her affidavit "Black PR". And this is why she deletes, of course, no because it contains uncomfortable truth...

and it's a distraction off of any message.

Magoo calls legitimate discussion about the inconsistencies between what she says to the press and her affidavit a "distraction". And this is why she deletes, of course, no because it contains uncomfortable truth...

Not only does Magoo engage in blatant lies, she also engage in censorship, and justify with blatant lies as well.

The plain and simple reason she has been deleting messages that clearly point to the inconsistencies between what she says to the press today and her affidavit from 2003 is because it clearly shows she is lying to the press today. She also has been banning their authors to prevent any sensible discussion on the subject.

The last message, from one Gymoxoq, was not deleted yet - probably because she realize that her censorship has let her opponents now to email people individually and she needs to have some sort of silly justification up to fool people into thinking she is actually addressing the issue, even though she is not, as we showed previously.

1 comment:

pignotti said...

It looks like she deleted another comment by "FreedomDignity" who tried to post a comment to a comment by Newtuber1964 who wrote:
"Like I said...you speak out for the common good! (And unfortunately, that really annoys people who want to find some "loophole" in your story or twist your words around)"
Newtuber's comment stayed up and surprise, surprise, FreedomDignity's response was deleted. An attempt has been made to repost it:
FreedomDignity response:
"Looks like my previous comment was either deleted or didn't go through so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and try again. Scientologists also sincerely believe they are working for the "common good". The problem here isn't intentions or "loopholes"; it is the holes in the story that are big enough to drive a truck through and contradictions, IMHO and the false assumption that anyone who points this out is OSA, a Scn, etc."
We'll see if that stays up.